They're scams. The top people make money exploiting those at lower levels, it's the fundamental structure of the organization. I have yet to hear of an example of someone getting in and making money - then again I don't take them seriously so I don't pay a lot of attention.
You do realize that the top level people invest time, the people who do not. Well they don't make money. It is a business of people who are outgoing and willing to go out and get what they want. Its sales nothing more.
That aside, I wouldn't mind hearing the pitch at least. So shoot me a pm.
I actually think it is basically the exact opposite. The whole idea of MLM is predicated on people under you doing the work. You don't make money from the products you sell, you basically break even, or perhaps a small percentage of profit. You make money by placing people under you, and receiving a portion of their sales.
That is why the entire concept of MLM is considered a scam. The people who originate the idea make money, while the people doing the work do not. I have yet to see any type of MLM scheme that is set up, at a fundamentally root level, any differently.
I really am not trying to defend any of these organizations but this is a bit of a short sighted viewpoint. Building the business takes work. People don't just fall into your lap. It takes hours and hours of networking, cold contacts, and working with people to find the diamonds in the rough to build a business enough that it starts to turn a profit. It's all in what kind of work you want to do. I am not a people person, not a salesman. If you are, it can be an outstanding business, even if it is predatory towards those it employs.
All businesses that want to stay in business are about making money. People don't employ others for charity. Even non-profits have to make money to keep their lights on and their doors open. They rely on charity, while businesses like these rely on networking and bringing in new people, and more traditional business relies on manufacturing, selling, or supporting products of some kind. Different approaches, all for a common purpose.
I see your point, but I don't agree with it. Working hard at exploiting people doesn't legitimize your business. Spending years networking, cold calling, fundraising, whatever it is, doesn't negate the ethical ramifications of what your business does. I think Juice Plus is a great example. The founders raised capital, paid for stellar endorsements, ran all the right commercials, "worked hard" but are now under investigation for unsubstantiated health claims. So what happens when Juice Plus gets hit with a class action suit because they were claiming their product does something it doesn't - and everyone who invested piles on?
I really struggle to see a difference between the Bernie Madoffs and Kenneth Lays, and the people who start these companies. Ultimately you're manipulating information, warping public perception, and exploiting the dollars of people below you for personal gain. Or, as we 'Muricans call it, unfettered capitalism.