Sorry but you asked for this by totally ignoring my final paragraph of the original post.
lol OP. The Devs don't have downtimes this long to mess with MQ2 just for the hell of it.
Opinion. No rational, intelligent, or thoughtful rebuttals or proof in any way.
The downtime was needed for all the server side changes f2p needed.
Opinion. Poor rebuttal and a very weak one at that. So weak in fact that it was already discussed in actual detail later on. Please see HTW's rebuttal and my counter rebuttal to him.
You seem to think this shit is easy and you just flip a switch and everything gets changed and works perfect.
Opinion based on an assumption and we all know what those who make assumptions end up doing to themselves. This time is no different since you must have missed that sentence where I stated I was in the hosting business so probably have a greater understanding of whats involved than you.
Would you rather have them make the changes in 6 hrs and take them down 3-4 times to fix the changes ?
Wow! Seriously? This is the choice we have? How did you come up with this choice? What are the suggested variables here, the patch time? I could keep going but whats the point. It is a random choice you pulled out of thin air generated from pure speculation.
If I may be allowed to make an assumption of my own (knowing full well I could be making an ass of out me). You seem to be saying that you believe that the time it takes them to complete their patches has a direct correlation with the number of times they have emergency patches. That in turn implies that it is your belief that part of that patch downtime is spent testing. Not simply just a part of that down time but a significant portion of it. If I'm wrong by all means please clarify because I cant even list all the reasons why I disagree with that.